<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 825 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755605</link>
    <description>Delayed filing of Form 10-IC did not justify denial of the concessional tax rate where the delay had been condoned under section 119(2)(b), the filing problem arose from technical difficulty on the income-tax portal, and CBDT Circular No. 6/2022 had extended the filing time limit. In these circumstances, the denial of the reduced rate under section 115BBA was treated as unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to taxation at the concessional rate instead of the normal rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 825 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755605</link>
      <description>Delayed filing of Form 10-IC did not justify denial of the concessional tax rate where the delay had been condoned under section 119(2)(b), the filing problem arose from technical difficulty on the income-tax portal, and CBDT Circular No. 6/2022 had extended the filing time limit. In these circumstances, the denial of the reduced rate under section 115BBA was treated as unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to taxation at the concessional rate instead of the normal rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>