<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1641 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456308</link>
    <description>The court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, accepting the reasons provided. However, it dismissed the application for condonation of a 1144-day delay in re-filing the appeal, citing unsatisfactory explanations from the Department. Consequently, the appeal ITA 324 of 2017 was dismissed due to this extended delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1641 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456308</link>
      <description>The court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, accepting the reasons provided. However, it dismissed the application for condonation of a 1144-day delay in re-filing the appeal, citing unsatisfactory explanations from the Department. Consequently, the appeal ITA 324 of 2017 was dismissed due to this extended delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>