https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456312 An arbitral tribunal appointed under a dealership agreement cannot decide or alter rights under a separate lease agreement when the two contracts have distinct arbitration clauses and appointing authorities. An award made beyond the submission to arbitration is vulnerable under Section 34(2)(a)(iv) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and a tribunal cannot rewrite agreed contractual terms by increasing rent or reducing the lease period. Such interference is beyond jurisdiction and amounts to patent illegality, so the award was set aside to the extent it modified the lease terms. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:50:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456312 An arbitral tribunal appointed under a dealership agreement cannot decide or alter rights under a separate lease agreement when the two contracts have distinct arbitration clauses and appointing authorities. An award made beyond the submission to arbitration is vulnerable under Section 34(2)(a)(iv) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and a tribunal cannot rewrite agreed contractual terms by increasing rent or reducing the lease period. Such interference is beyond jurisdiction and amounts to patent illegality, so the award was set aside to the extent it modified the lease terms. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456312