<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 810 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755590</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, due to inadequate service of the show cause notice, which was improperly categorized on the portal. The matter was remanded to the concerned authority for fresh adjudication. The petitioner was granted two weeks to respond, with a directive for the authority to consider the response and provide a hearing opportunity before making a decision. The petition and any pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 810 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755590</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, due to inadequate service of the show cause notice, which was improperly categorized on the portal. The matter was remanded to the concerned authority for fresh adjudication. The petitioner was granted two weeks to respond, with a directive for the authority to consider the response and provide a hearing opportunity before making a decision. The petition and any pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>