https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755584 The HC partially allowed the petition challenging suspension of GST registration. The petitioner failed to file tax returns for six consecutive months, leading to adverse order from State Tax Officer. The court found that sustaining the order would prevent petitioner from conducting business and require fresh registration. Considering petitioner's explanation that sole accountant suffered from Covid-19 infection during pandemic restrictions, the court permitted re-hearing before State Tax Officer subject to conditions and imposed token cost of Rs. 5,000 on petitioner for the lapse. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 May 2025 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755584 The HC partially allowed the petition challenging suspension of GST registration. The petitioner failed to file tax returns for six consecutive months, leading to adverse order from State Tax Officer. The court found that sustaining the order would prevent petitioner from conducting business and require fresh registration. Considering petitioner's explanation that sole accountant suffered from Covid-19 infection during pandemic restrictions, the court permitted re-hearing before State Tax Officer subject to conditions and imposed token cost of Rs. 5,000 on petitioner for the lapse. Case-Laws GST Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755584