<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 795 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755575</link>
    <description>Kerala HC ruled in favor of appellant-Bank on multiple deduction disputes. Regarding Section 14A disallowance for expenses related to tax-free dividend income, the court followed SC precedent in South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT, holding that separate accounts showing investments from surplus funds are unnecessary if interest-free funds exceed investments. For Section 36(1)(viii) deduction post-2010 amendment, HC held that banking companies remain entitled to deductions for long-term housing finance as &quot;Development of Housing in India&quot; encompasses construction/purchase activities. The Section 36(1)(viia) rural area deduction issue was remitted to Appellate Tribunal for reconsideration under Section 36(1)(vii), pending SC resolution on rural classification criteria.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:20:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 795 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755575</link>
      <description>Kerala HC ruled in favor of appellant-Bank on multiple deduction disputes. Regarding Section 14A disallowance for expenses related to tax-free dividend income, the court followed SC precedent in South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT, holding that separate accounts showing investments from surplus funds are unnecessary if interest-free funds exceed investments. For Section 36(1)(viii) deduction post-2010 amendment, HC held that banking companies remain entitled to deductions for long-term housing finance as &quot;Development of Housing in India&quot; encompasses construction/purchase activities. The Section 36(1)(viia) rural area deduction issue was remitted to Appellate Tribunal for reconsideration under Section 36(1)(vii), pending SC resolution on rural classification criteria.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>