<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 75 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37465</link>
    <description>Loss on sale of Government securities was treated as a revenue loss where the securities were acquired and disposed of as part of business operations and the related interest formed part of business profits. Expenditure on income-tax appeals, including fees, travelling and professional charges, was held deductible because it was incurred for the protection of the business and was justified by commercial expediency. The Tribunal could not, in appeal, direct the Income-tax Officer to examine reduction of penal interest under section 18A(6), as such relief lay outside ordinary appellate jurisdiction. Development rebate on the refrigerator was not allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:20:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 75 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37465</link>
      <description>Loss on sale of Government securities was treated as a revenue loss where the securities were acquired and disposed of as part of business operations and the related interest formed part of business profits. Expenditure on income-tax appeals, including fees, travelling and professional charges, was held deductible because it was incurred for the protection of the business and was justified by commercial expediency. The Tribunal could not, in appeal, direct the Income-tax Officer to examine reduction of penal interest under section 18A(6), as such relief lay outside ordinary appellate jurisdiction. Development rebate on the refrigerator was not allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>