<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1230 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456289</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the tax appeal, affirming the ITAT and CIT-A&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The court found no concealment by the Assessee, as the Rs. 61,00,000 added under section 68 was voluntarily surrendered without any detection or additional information by the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 12:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1230 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456289</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the tax appeal, affirming the ITAT and CIT-A&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The court found no concealment by the Assessee, as the Rs. 61,00,000 added under section 68 was voluntarily surrendered without any detection or additional information by the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>