<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1299 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456279</link>
    <description>The Comm. Tax Tribunal, Lucknow, upheld the best judgment assessment against the revisionist for the 2008-09 tax year, dismissing the revision. The revisionist failed to challenge crucial findings regarding stock variations and invoice discrepancies. The Court found no grounds for interference, affirming the assessment and resolving legal questions against the revisionist.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1299 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456279</link>
      <description>The Comm. Tax Tribunal, Lucknow, upheld the best judgment assessment against the revisionist for the 2008-09 tax year, dismissing the revision. The revisionist failed to challenge crucial findings regarding stock variations and invoice discrepancies. The Court found no grounds for interference, affirming the assessment and resolving legal questions against the revisionist.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>