<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1480 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456280</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal on grounds of low tax effect, indicating that the financial implications involved did not warrant further judicial review. The decision was rendered by Justices A.K. Sikri and R.K. Agrawal, affirming the lower court&#039;s ruling without addressing the substantive merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1480 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456280</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal on grounds of low tax effect, indicating that the financial implications involved did not warrant further judicial review. The decision was rendered by Justices A.K. Sikri and R.K. Agrawal, affirming the lower court&#039;s ruling without addressing the substantive merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>