<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 749 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755529</link>
    <description>HC remitted tax assessment order back to tax authorities after finding insufficient reasoning. Petitioner admitted tax liability for certain years, with demands confirmed for others. Court directed respondent to pass fresh order within 3 months, requiring petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax. Writ Petition allowed without costs, providing opportunity for detailed reconsideration of tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 749 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755529</link>
      <description>HC remitted tax assessment order back to tax authorities after finding insufficient reasoning. Petitioner admitted tax liability for certain years, with demands confirmed for others. Court directed respondent to pass fresh order within 3 months, requiring petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax. Writ Petition allowed without costs, providing opportunity for detailed reconsideration of tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>