<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 746 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755526</link>
    <description>HC allowed partial challenge to tax assessment order. Petitioner, a non-banking financial institution, was granted opportunity to submit additional documents and clarifications regarding tax reconciliation for two financial years. Order was set aside with conditions, requiring 10% tax deposit and allowing reconsideration within three months. No costs were imposed, providing procedural relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 746 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755526</link>
      <description>HC allowed partial challenge to tax assessment order. Petitioner, a non-banking financial institution, was granted opportunity to submit additional documents and clarifications regarding tax reconciliation for two financial years. Order was set aside with conditions, requiring 10% tax deposit and allowing reconsideration within three months. No costs were imposed, providing procedural relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>