<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 740 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755520</link>
    <description>HC allowed appeal challenging tax authority&#039;s mechanical rejection of delay condonation. Despite 13-day delay, medical documents substantiated petitioner&#039;s reasons. Court found appellate authority&#039;s order perverse and directed reconsideration of appeal on merits within 8 weeks, emphasizing proper application of mind when evaluating delay condonation applications under tax legislation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 740 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755520</link>
      <description>HC allowed appeal challenging tax authority&#039;s mechanical rejection of delay condonation. Despite 13-day delay, medical documents substantiated petitioner&#039;s reasons. Court found appellate authority&#039;s order perverse and directed reconsideration of appeal on merits within 8 weeks, emphasizing proper application of mind when evaluating delay condonation applications under tax legislation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>