<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 736 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755516</link>
    <description>Court quashed tax imposition order due to GST return discrepancies. Petitioner&#039;s inability to auto-populate Input Tax Credit was recognized. Court remitted case back to respondent, directing fresh orders within three months, lifting bank account attachment, and providing petitioner opportunity to file reply within 30 days. Writ Petition disposed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 736 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755516</link>
      <description>Court quashed tax imposition order due to GST return discrepancies. Petitioner&#039;s inability to auto-populate Input Tax Credit was recognized. Court remitted case back to respondent, directing fresh orders within three months, lifting bank account attachment, and providing petitioner opportunity to file reply within 30 days. Writ Petition disposed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>