<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 694 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755474</link>
    <description>An arbitral interim direction to sign disputed financial statements was held beyond jurisdiction because it was not in aid of the main relief and would effectively place the contested accounts into circulation before adjudication, rendering the arbitration infructuous. The accounting standards relied on were held not binding on Income Tax Authorities, and an arbitral order could not bind those statutory authorities absent statutory control or a judgment in rem. The claimant could not be compelled to sign the statements at that stage, as doing so could expose him to penal consequences and self-incrimination. The interim order was therefore interfered with as legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 694 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755474</link>
      <description>An arbitral interim direction to sign disputed financial statements was held beyond jurisdiction because it was not in aid of the main relief and would effectively place the contested accounts into circulation before adjudication, rendering the arbitration infructuous. The accounting standards relied on were held not binding on Income Tax Authorities, and an arbitral order could not bind those statutory authorities absent statutory control or a judgment in rem. The claimant could not be compelled to sign the statements at that stage, as doing so could expose him to penal consequences and self-incrimination. The interim order was therefore interfered with as legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>