https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755473 The NCLAT Chennai ruled that free copies provided under Rule 50 of NCLT Rules cannot substitute certified copies required under Rule 22(2) of NCLAT Rules for appeal purposes. Following precedent from a three-member bench decision and SC guidance, the tribunal held that appeals under Section 61 of IBC 2016 must be filed with proper certified copies obtained under Section 76 of Evidence Act, not free copies. The distinction between certified and free copies for appeal maintainability was definitively established, with limitation principles requiring certified copies for valid appeals. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755473 The NCLAT Chennai ruled that free copies provided under Rule 50 of NCLT Rules cannot substitute certified copies required under Rule 22(2) of NCLAT Rules for appeal purposes. Following precedent from a three-member bench decision and SC guidance, the tribunal held that appeals under Section 61 of IBC 2016 must be filed with proper certified copies obtained under Section 76 of Evidence Act, not free copies. The distinction between certified and free copies for appeal maintainability was definitively established, with limitation principles requiring certified copies for valid appeals. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755473