https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755466 Classification dispute concerning Liv 52 Protec centred on whether the product fell under animal feed supplement tariff headings or under an export chapter heading; CESTAT had classified the bulk liquid as exported under the export chapter heading, and the reviewing forum declined to interfere with that classification. The consequence is that the civil appeal against the CESTAT classification was dismissed, leaving the export chapter heading characterization intact and applicable for tariff and regulatory treatment. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755466 Classification dispute concerning Liv 52 Protec centred on whether the product fell under animal feed supplement tariff headings or under an export chapter heading; CESTAT had classified the bulk liquid as exported under the export chapter heading, and the reviewing forum declined to interfere with that classification. The consequence is that the civil appeal against the CESTAT classification was dismissed, leaving the export chapter heading characterization intact and applicable for tariff and regulatory treatment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755466