https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755465 CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the impugned order regarding classification of UVA Lotion/Gel/Hyclean Cream. The tribunal found the adjudicating authority failed to obtain expert opinion or testing before classifying the products, despite evidence indicating medicament classification under Chapter 3004 including prescription-only sale requirements and UV protection properties. Extended period demand was rejected as no suppression of facts was established, with appellant regularly filing returns and claiming exemptions. Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for reconsideration of normal period demand with proper expert evaluation. en-us Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:18:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755465 CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the impugned order regarding classification of UVA Lotion/Gel/Hyclean Cream. The tribunal found the adjudicating authority failed to obtain expert opinion or testing before classifying the products, despite evidence indicating medicament classification under Chapter 3004 including prescription-only sale requirements and UV protection properties. Extended period demand was rejected as no suppression of facts was established, with appellant regularly filing returns and claiming exemptions. Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for reconsideration of normal period demand with proper expert evaluation. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755465