<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 44 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed on the assessee for concealing income, holding that the burden of proof lay with the department. The court found that the Explanation to s. 271(1) applied retrospectively, shifting the burden to the assessee if income was less than 80% of assessed income. The court concluded that the Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty and directed further consideration of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:01:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 44 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed on the assessee for concealing income, holding that the burden of proof lay with the department. The court found that the Explanation to s. 271(1) applied retrospectively, shifting the burden to the assessee if income was less than 80% of assessed income. The court concluded that the Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty and directed further consideration of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>