<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Insolvency Proceedings Under IBC Section 7 Take Priority Over Conflicting Laws, NCLAT Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79336</link>
    <description>The NCLAT held that Section 238 of the IBC gives overriding effect to proceedings u/s 7, despite Section 10 of CPC. Proceedings u/s 7 must proceed, as the Code&#039;s provisions prevail over inconsistent laws. Insolvency resolution must be detected early, and remedial measures taken. Section 7 proceedings cannot be barred by Section 19 proceedings, as they cover different fields. The DRT&#039;s rejection of Section 19 proceedings cannot bar a Section 7 application. The determination of default in DRT proceedings, pending in the High Court, is relevant for Section 19 but not a reason to bar Section 7 proceedings. The Supreme Court held that a Section 7 petition is an independent proceeding, unaffected by other pending proceedings. The DRT&#039;s order and .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:42:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Insolvency Proceedings Under IBC Section 7 Take Priority Over Conflicting Laws, NCLAT Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79336</link>
      <description>The NCLAT held that Section 238 of the IBC gives overriding effect to proceedings u/s 7, despite Section 10 of CPC. Proceedings u/s 7 must proceed, as the Code&#039;s provisions prevail over inconsistent laws. Insolvency resolution must be detected early, and remedial measures taken. Section 7 proceedings cannot be barred by Section 19 proceedings, as they cover different fields. The DRT&#039;s rejection of Section 19 proceedings cannot bar a Section 7 application. The determination of default in DRT proceedings, pending in the High Court, is relevant for Section 19 but not a reason to bar Section 7 proceedings. The Supreme Court held that a Section 7 petition is an independent proceeding, unaffected by other pending proceedings. The DRT&#039;s order and .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:42:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>