https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456275 The HC dismissed the habeas corpus petition, ruling that the petitioner's detention and deportation were lawful under the J&K Preventive Detention Act and the Foreigners Act. As a foreigner, the petitioner had no right to remain in India, and his detention complied with procedural requirements, including notification of grounds and right to representation. The court upheld the State's actions as consistent with constitutional and statutory provisions, emphasizing that the petitioner's claim to personal liberty could not supersede regulations on foreigners' entry, stay, and expulsion. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456275 The HC dismissed the habeas corpus petition, ruling that the petitioner's detention and deportation were lawful under the J&K Preventive Detention Act and the Foreigners Act. As a foreigner, the petitioner had no right to remain in India, and his detention complied with procedural requirements, including notification of grounds and right to representation. The court upheld the State's actions as consistent with constitutional and statutory provisions, emphasizing that the petitioner's claim to personal liberty could not supersede regulations on foreigners' entry, stay, and expulsion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Jul 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456275