https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755455 A person summoned under Section 69 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for recording a statement cannot invoke anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On that basis, the High Court's cancellation of anticipatory bail was upheld because no error was found in the rejection of that relief. The Court also granted liberty to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution and ordered interim protection from arrest for six weeks, providing limited temporary relief while declining substantive interference on anticipatory bail. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755455 A person summoned under Section 69 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for recording a statement cannot invoke anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On that basis, the High Court's cancellation of anticipatory bail was upheld because no error was found in the rejection of that relief. The Court also granted liberty to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution and ordered interim protection from arrest for six weeks, providing limited temporary relief while declining substantive interference on anticipatory bail. Case-Laws GST Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755455