<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 53 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against the income of the assessee-firm for the relevant year. The court held that unabsorbed depreciation retains its identity even when allocated among partners and should be set off against future income, disagreeing with the revenue&#039;s contention. The Tribunal was tasked with determining the remaining unadjusted amount of depreciation against the partners&#039; income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:44:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 53 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against the income of the assessee-firm for the relevant year. The court held that unabsorbed depreciation retains its identity even when allocated among partners and should be set off against future income, disagreeing with the revenue&#039;s contention. The Tribunal was tasked with determining the remaining unadjusted amount of depreciation against the partners&#039; income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>