<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 672 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755452</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner, a medicine seller who was wrongfully denied GST registration restoration after jail custody. Court set aside registration cancellation, allowing petitioner to file returns, pay requisite taxes and penalties within specified timeline. The decision emphasized considering individual circumstances and procedural fairness in tax administration, providing a pathway for registration reinstatement subject to compliance conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 672 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755452</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner, a medicine seller who was wrongfully denied GST registration restoration after jail custody. Court set aside registration cancellation, allowing petitioner to file returns, pay requisite taxes and penalties within specified timeline. The decision emphasized considering individual circumstances and procedural fairness in tax administration, providing a pathway for registration reinstatement subject to compliance conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>