<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755448</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax assessment due to procedural irregularities. The court set aside the original order, directing tax authorities to provide proper notice and personal hearing. Petitioner must remit 10% of disputed tax demand and submit reply within specified timeframe. Respondent instructed to reconsider the tax proposal and issue a fresh order within three months, ensuring principles of natural justice are followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755448</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax assessment due to procedural irregularities. The court set aside the original order, directing tax authorities to provide proper notice and personal hearing. Petitioner must remit 10% of disputed tax demand and submit reply within specified timeframe. Respondent instructed to reconsider the tax proposal and issue a fresh order within three months, ensuring principles of natural justice are followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>