<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 644 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755424</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding penalty under section 271(1)(c) levied consequent to an assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 263. The tribunal held that since the PCIT&#039;s order under section 263 was previously quashed by ITAT in a separate appeal, the consequential assessment order became unsustainable. As the assessment order formed the basis for penalty levy, the penalty could not be sustained when its foundation was invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 644 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755424</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding penalty under section 271(1)(c) levied consequent to an assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 263. The tribunal held that since the PCIT&#039;s order under section 263 was previously quashed by ITAT in a separate appeal, the consequential assessment order became unsustainable. As the assessment order formed the basis for penalty levy, the penalty could not be sustained when its foundation was invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>