<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (5) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37438</link>
    <description>Share transactions settled by payment of differences, with delivery taken or given only for the net excess, fall within the speculative transaction test in Explanation 2 to section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because actual delivery of the scrips is required. Clearing house adjustment, commercial set-off, or constructive delivery do not satisfy that requirement. Transactions of this kind are treated as a separate speculative business under Explanation 1, so the resulting losses are confined to set-off against speculative profits. The loss in the Difference Account was therefore treated as speculative loss and the result was against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:29:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (5) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37438</link>
      <description>Share transactions settled by payment of differences, with delivery taken or given only for the net excess, fall within the speculative transaction test in Explanation 2 to section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because actual delivery of the scrips is required. Clearing house adjustment, commercial set-off, or constructive delivery do not satisfy that requirement. Transactions of this kind are treated as a separate speculative business under Explanation 1, so the resulting losses are confined to set-off against speculative profits. The loss in the Difference Account was therefore treated as speculative loss and the result was against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>