<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 629 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755409</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere because the main customs matter was still pending before the Commissioner of Customs (Import). It directed the Commissioner to dispose of the matter as early as possible and dismissed the civil appeals, with pending applications also disposed of. Delay was condoned, but the order turned on the matter remaining at large rather than on any adjudication of the substantive customs dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 629 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755409</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere because the main customs matter was still pending before the Commissioner of Customs (Import). It directed the Commissioner to dispose of the matter as early as possible and dismissed the civil appeals, with pending applications also disposed of. Delay was condoned, but the order turned on the matter remaining at large rather than on any adjudication of the substantive customs dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>