<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 622 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755402</link>
    <description>Electroplating of automobile filter components on a job-work basis was treated as manufacture, applying the Tribunal&#039;s view and the relevant note to Section XVI. As the process constituted manufacture, the activity fell outside Business Auxiliary Service and did not attract service tax. The assessee was therefore not liable to pay service tax on the electroplating activity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 08:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 622 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755402</link>
      <description>Electroplating of automobile filter components on a job-work basis was treated as manufacture, applying the Tribunal&#039;s view and the relevant note to Section XVI. As the process constituted manufacture, the activity fell outside Business Auxiliary Service and did not attract service tax. The assessee was therefore not liable to pay service tax on the electroplating activity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>