<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1144 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456273</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the orders dated February 22, 2020, and March 19, 2019, related to tax evasion and penalty imposition against the petitioner. It found that the error in the E-way bills was minor and lacked the mens rea necessary for tax evasion. The court ordered the respondents to refund the tax and penalty amount to the petitioner within four weeks. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 22:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1144 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456273</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the orders dated February 22, 2020, and March 19, 2019, related to tax evasion and penalty imposition against the petitioner. It found that the error in the E-way bills was minor and lacked the mens rea necessary for tax evasion. The court ordered the respondents to refund the tax and penalty amount to the petitioner within four weeks. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>