https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755393 HC ruled in favor of petitioner, setting aside GST detention order for goods due to minor date discrepancy on tax invoice and E-way bill. The Court found no intentional tax evasion, emphasizing that typographical errors alone cannot justify goods seizure. The judgment directed refund of deposited amounts and highlighted the necessity of proving deliberate tax fraud. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 May 2025 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755393 HC ruled in favor of petitioner, setting aside GST detention order for goods due to minor date discrepancy on tax invoice and E-way bill. The Court found no intentional tax evasion, emphasizing that typographical errors alone cannot justify goods seizure. The judgment directed refund of deposited amounts and highlighted the necessity of proving deliberate tax fraud. Case-Laws GST Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755393