<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37430</link>
    <description>The court held that route permits are considered property and can be subject to taxation as capital gains. It directed the Tribunal to investigate the cost of acquisition for the permits before determining the tax liability on the amount received from their sale. The court emphasized the need to establish whether any cost was incurred in acquiring the permits to ascertain the tax treatment accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37430</link>
      <description>The court held that route permits are considered property and can be subject to taxation as capital gains. It directed the Tribunal to investigate the cost of acquisition for the permits before determining the tax liability on the amount received from their sale. The court emphasized the need to establish whether any cost was incurred in acquiring the permits to ascertain the tax treatment accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>