<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 594 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755374</link>
    <description>HC found merit in petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST assessment order. Despite procedural lapses in communication between Central and State GST authorities, evidence of prior adjustments in GSTR returns warranted reconsideration. Order was quashed and remanded for fresh evaluation, directing respondent to provide reasonable opportunity for hearing within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 594 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755374</link>
      <description>HC found merit in petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST assessment order. Despite procedural lapses in communication between Central and State GST authorities, evidence of prior adjustments in GSTR returns warranted reconsideration. Order was quashed and remanded for fresh evaluation, directing respondent to provide reasonable opportunity for hearing within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>