<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755373</link>
    <description>HC quashed tax assessment order against a trading company due to procedural irregularities. The court found significant defects in the assessment process, including failure to consider the petitioner&#039;s submissions and denying a personal hearing. HC directed reassessment within two months, ordered lifting of bank account attachment, and mandated providing a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755373</link>
      <description>HC quashed tax assessment order against a trading company due to procedural irregularities. The court found significant defects in the assessment process, including failure to consider the petitioner&#039;s submissions and denying a personal hearing. HC directed reassessment within two months, ordered lifting of bank account attachment, and mandated providing a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>