<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 590 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755370</link>
    <description>The Meghalaya HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision allowing assessee&#039;s appeal regarding hybrid accounting system for interest on debtors. The court ruled that once a revision order u/s 263 was set aside by PCIT and became final, subsequent reassessment orders by AO were invalid. The HC rejected revenue&#039;s contention that assessee violated Section 145 by following cash basis for interest on debtors while using mercantile system otherwise. The court held that without challenging the fundamental accounting aspect across different assessment years, revenue cannot alter the position in subsequent years. The tribunal&#039;s order was deemed justified without any infirmity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 590 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755370</link>
      <description>The Meghalaya HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision allowing assessee&#039;s appeal regarding hybrid accounting system for interest on debtors. The court ruled that once a revision order u/s 263 was set aside by PCIT and became final, subsequent reassessment orders by AO were invalid. The HC rejected revenue&#039;s contention that assessee violated Section 145 by following cash basis for interest on debtors while using mercantile system otherwise. The court held that without challenging the fundamental accounting aspect across different assessment years, revenue cannot alter the position in subsequent years. The tribunal&#039;s order was deemed justified without any infirmity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>