<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 589 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755369</link>
    <description>HC held the reassessment notices issued by the Junior Assessing Officer were invalid for lack of jurisdiction under Section 151A and the Central Government notification dated 29 March 2022. Relying on the court&#039;s prior decision, the impugned notices were quashed as illegal and void. The petition was allowed in terms of the primary relief sought, setting aside the notices issued by the JAO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 589 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755369</link>
      <description>HC held the reassessment notices issued by the Junior Assessing Officer were invalid for lack of jurisdiction under Section 151A and the Central Government notification dated 29 March 2022. Relying on the court&#039;s prior decision, the impugned notices were quashed as illegal and void. The petition was allowed in terms of the primary relief sought, setting aside the notices issued by the JAO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>