<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 581 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755361</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice issued under section 148 was treated as time-barred because it fell under the earlier limitation regime applicable to the assessment year, and the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s binding view was followed. The revenue&#039;s reliance on the COVID-19 extension was rejected in light of the controlling precedents. As the notice was beyond the permissible limitation period, the consequential reassessment proceedings and orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 581 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755361</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice issued under section 148 was treated as time-barred because it fell under the earlier limitation regime applicable to the assessment year, and the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s binding view was followed. The revenue&#039;s reliance on the COVID-19 extension was rejected in light of the controlling precedents. As the notice was beyond the permissible limitation period, the consequential reassessment proceedings and orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>