<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 557 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755337</link>
    <description>The SC, with Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay Karol, and Sanjay Kumar, dismissed the special leave petition, refusing to interfere with the impugned judgment. The Court clarified that the judgment does not obstruct the Directorate of Enforcement from proceeding under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. All pending applications are deemed disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 08:36:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 557 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755337</link>
      <description>The SC, with Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay Karol, and Sanjay Kumar, dismissed the special leave petition, refusing to interfere with the impugned judgment. The Court clarified that the judgment does not obstruct the Directorate of Enforcement from proceeding under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. All pending applications are deemed disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>