<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 551 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755331</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that services provided to UN agencies including UNDP, UNICEF, UN Women, UN AIDS, UNODC, and UNOPS are exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST without requiring separate government notification. The demand for these services was set aside. Services to educational institutions during 2014-15 were also exempted. However, claims regarding services rendered in J&amp;amp;K and to SEZ units were remanded to adjudicating authority for fresh consideration with opportunity to submit corroborative evidence. Extended limitation period was not invoked due to lack of evidence showing positive suppression. Penalties under sections 77-78 were dropped.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 551 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755331</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that services provided to UN agencies including UNDP, UNICEF, UN Women, UN AIDS, UNODC, and UNOPS are exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST without requiring separate government notification. The demand for these services was set aside. Services to educational institutions during 2014-15 were also exempted. However, claims regarding services rendered in J&amp;amp;K and to SEZ units were remanded to adjudicating authority for fresh consideration with opportunity to submit corroborative evidence. Extended limitation period was not invoked due to lack of evidence showing positive suppression. Penalties under sections 77-78 were dropped.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>