<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 539 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755319</link>
    <description>Writ proceedings under Article 226 are not constrained by Order XXI Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure as a mandatory limitation, because the CPC does not govern such constitutional review except to a limited extent. A revenue auction under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code must still comply strictly with mandatory notice, confirmation and possession requirements; premature auction, issuance of the sale certificate before confirmation, early delivery of possession, and suppression of material objections were treated as breaches going to the root of the sale. The appellate remedy under the revenue code was also recognised as available on the facts, sustaining the appellate authority&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 539 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755319</link>
      <description>Writ proceedings under Article 226 are not constrained by Order XXI Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure as a mandatory limitation, because the CPC does not govern such constitutional review except to a limited extent. A revenue auction under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code must still comply strictly with mandatory notice, confirmation and possession requirements; premature auction, issuance of the sale certificate before confirmation, early delivery of possession, and suppression of material objections were treated as breaches going to the root of the sale. The appellate remedy under the revenue code was also recognised as available on the facts, sustaining the appellate authority&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>