<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 533 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755313</link>
    <description>Calcutta HC quashed an attachment order dated 21st February 2024 in a case involving a show cause notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act. The petitioner challenged the SCN and adjudication order, claiming lack of knowledge as the notice was uploaded in the &quot;view additional notices and orders&quot; section rather than the standard &quot;view notices and orders&quot; section of the portal. While the court found the petitioner had opportunity to respond and failed to file any response or seek extension, it acknowledged potential confusion due to the pre-redesigned dashboard. The court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority and disposed of the petition by quashing the attachment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 533 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755313</link>
      <description>Calcutta HC quashed an attachment order dated 21st February 2024 in a case involving a show cause notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act. The petitioner challenged the SCN and adjudication order, claiming lack of knowledge as the notice was uploaded in the &quot;view additional notices and orders&quot; section rather than the standard &quot;view notices and orders&quot; section of the portal. While the court found the petitioner had opportunity to respond and failed to file any response or seek extension, it acknowledged potential confusion due to the pre-redesigned dashboard. The court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority and disposed of the petition by quashing the attachment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>