https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755312 Delhi HC held that GST registration cancellation based solely on petitioner's non-existence at principal place of business was premature without allowing adequate response opportunity. The court noted petitioner had changed its principal place of business multiple times. HC directed petitioner be permitted to file response explaining when it ceased operations from the registered address and provide evidence of actual business location. The petition was disposed of with directions for proper adjudication after allowing petitioner to present its case. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 May 2025 12:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755312 Delhi HC held that GST registration cancellation based solely on petitioner's non-existence at principal place of business was premature without allowing adequate response opportunity. The court noted petitioner had changed its principal place of business multiple times. HC directed petitioner be permitted to file response explaining when it ceased operations from the registered address and provide evidence of actual business location. The petition was disposed of with directions for proper adjudication after allowing petitioner to present its case. Case-Laws GST Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755312