<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 529 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755309</link>
    <description>SC analyzed statutory compliance in tax proceedings, focusing on personal hearing notices and circular interpretation. The court quashed impugned orders and directed proper procedural adherence, allowing petitioners to file statutory appeals. While rejecting primary contentions, the judgment emphasized following circular guidelines and maintained that Intelligence Officers can pass orders within departmental procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 529 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755309</link>
      <description>SC analyzed statutory compliance in tax proceedings, focusing on personal hearing notices and circular interpretation. The court quashed impugned orders and directed proper procedural adherence, allowing petitioners to file statutory appeals. While rejecting primary contentions, the judgment emphasized following circular guidelines and maintained that Intelligence Officers can pass orders within departmental procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>