<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 514 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755294</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata Bench &#039;A&#039; ruled that the initiation of proceedings under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act was unauthorized due to the absence of a satisfaction note from the assessing officer of the searched person. The assessing officer of the respondent/assessee improperly initiated the proceedings, violating procedural requirements. The ITAT found jurisdictional issues and concluded that the assessing officer&#039;s actions were without authority, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Manish Maheshwari. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee and against the revenue, with no substantial question of law supporting the revenue&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 514 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755294</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata Bench &#039;A&#039; ruled that the initiation of proceedings under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act was unauthorized due to the absence of a satisfaction note from the assessing officer of the searched person. The assessing officer of the respondent/assessee improperly initiated the proceedings, violating procedural requirements. The ITAT found jurisdictional issues and concluded that the assessing officer&#039;s actions were without authority, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Manish Maheshwari. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee and against the revenue, with no substantial question of law supporting the revenue&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>