<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Investment Deemed Bogus: Share Application Money Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit, Appeal Dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79278</link>
    <description>The assessee received share application money and premium from a company that admitted to providing accommodation entries. The AO rejected the assessee&#039;s claim, citing the non-appearance of the director as insufficient grounds. The ITAT held that the assessee failed to rebut the AO&#039;s finding that the share applicant company received cash from an accommodation entry provider and transferred it to the assessee. The accommodation entry provider&#039;s statement corroborated the initiation of assessment proceedings. The AO did not accept the assessee&#039;s procedural evidence, questioning how a newly incorporated company could command such a premium. The assessee failed to provide details of its assets and business prospects or produce the share applica.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:01:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Investment Deemed Bogus: Share Application Money Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit, Appeal Dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79278</link>
      <description>The assessee received share application money and premium from a company that admitted to providing accommodation entries. The AO rejected the assessee&#039;s claim, citing the non-appearance of the director as insufficient grounds. The ITAT held that the assessee failed to rebut the AO&#039;s finding that the share applicant company received cash from an accommodation entry provider and transferred it to the assessee. The accommodation entry provider&#039;s statement corroborated the initiation of assessment proceedings. The AO did not accept the assessee&#039;s procedural evidence, questioning how a newly incorporated company could command such a premium. The assessee failed to provide details of its assets and business prospects or produce the share applica.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:01:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>