<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 479 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755259</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. It concluded that the demand for service tax on foreign remittances to overseas providers was unsustainable for a specified period. The Tribunal also determined that the taxability of business exhibition services conducted entirely outside India was inapplicable for a certain timeframe. Furthermore, the imposition of a penalty under Section 78 was deemed unsustainable due to the ambiguous legal position during the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 479 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755259</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. It concluded that the demand for service tax on foreign remittances to overseas providers was unsustainable for a specified period. The Tribunal also determined that the taxability of business exhibition services conducted entirely outside India was inapplicable for a certain timeframe. Furthermore, the imposition of a penalty under Section 78 was deemed unsustainable due to the ambiguous legal position during the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>