<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (3) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456239</link>
    <description>Under the evacuee property sale rules, title was treated as passing on confirmation of the highest bid once the full purchase price had been paid; the later issue of the sale certificate was only a ministerial step, so the landlord could claim rent and pursue ejectment from confirmation. On rent default, the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act made eviction mandatory where arrears were not paid or tendered within the statutory period, and the tenant had no independent equitable relief against forfeiture. The tenant&#039;s challenge therefore failed on both title and statutory protection against eviction, and eviction was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 17:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (3) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456239</link>
      <description>Under the evacuee property sale rules, title was treated as passing on confirmation of the highest bid once the full purchase price had been paid; the later issue of the sale certificate was only a ministerial step, so the landlord could claim rent and pursue ejectment from confirmation. On rent default, the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act made eviction mandatory where arrears were not paid or tendered within the statutory period, and the tenant had no independent equitable relief against forfeiture. The tenant&#039;s challenge therefore failed on both title and statutory protection against eviction, and eviction was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>