<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 445 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755225</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC quashed reassessment proceedings under section 147, ruling that the AO lacked valid reason to believe for reopening assessment regarding unexplained gold under section 69. The court held that gold ornaments were already recorded in petitioner&#039;s books and all details including quantity, stock, and purchase documents were submitted during original scrutiny under section 143(3). The AO merely relied on information from Investigation Unit without independent satisfaction, constituting impermissible borrowed satisfaction. Since no new or tangible material emerged and reassessment was based on change of opinion rather than fresh evidence, the proceedings were legally invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 445 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755225</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC quashed reassessment proceedings under section 147, ruling that the AO lacked valid reason to believe for reopening assessment regarding unexplained gold under section 69. The court held that gold ornaments were already recorded in petitioner&#039;s books and all details including quantity, stock, and purchase documents were submitted during original scrutiny under section 143(3). The AO merely relied on information from Investigation Unit without independent satisfaction, constituting impermissible borrowed satisfaction. Since no new or tangible material emerged and reassessment was based on change of opinion rather than fresh evidence, the proceedings were legally invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>