<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755212</link>
    <description>Consideration for live transmission rights was treated as not constituting royalty under the Income-tax Act and the India-Australia tax treaty because the arrangement granted only transmission rights, not an independent copyright-like interest. The foreign exchange difference addition was largely linked to those receipts and was therefore reduced, with the remaining reconciliation issue sent back for limited verification. Sponsorship receipts under the commercial partnership agreement were likewise held not to be royalty, as the sponsor received only a limited, non-exclusive and purpose-restricted licence to use logos and branding for promotion, without any transfer of an exclusive intellectual property right. The article states that royalty arises only where there is an independent transfer of copyright-like or exclusive IP rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 20:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755212</link>
      <description>Consideration for live transmission rights was treated as not constituting royalty under the Income-tax Act and the India-Australia tax treaty because the arrangement granted only transmission rights, not an independent copyright-like interest. The foreign exchange difference addition was largely linked to those receipts and was therefore reduced, with the remaining reconciliation issue sent back for limited verification. Sponsorship receipts under the commercial partnership agreement were likewise held not to be royalty, as the sponsor received only a limited, non-exclusive and purpose-restricted licence to use logos and branding for promotion, without any transfer of an exclusive intellectual property right. The article states that royalty arises only where there is an independent transfer of copyright-like or exclusive IP rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>