https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755207 An amendment to the Benami law effective from 01.11.2016 could not be applied retrospectively to transactions of 2011-2015, following the principle recognised in Ganpati Dealcom. On the parties' consensus that the subject transactions pre-dated the amendment, the Telangana HC held that no further merits adjudication was required and set aside the impugned orders. The writ petitions were allowed, and the challenged orders ceased to operate. en-us Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jul 2024 07:52:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755207 An amendment to the Benami law effective from 01.11.2016 could not be applied retrospectively to transactions of 2011-2015, following the principle recognised in Ganpati Dealcom. On the parties' consensus that the subject transactions pre-dated the amendment, the Telangana HC held that no further merits adjudication was required and set aside the impugned orders. The writ petitions were allowed, and the challenged orders ceased to operate. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755207